Scientists have come up with a material, essentially an ink, that they
say could be used to safely test liquids brought on board airplanes.
If a group of scientists can get their project off the ground, there's a
chance U.S. air travelers may one day be able to bring aboard more
liquids in their carry-on luggage again.
The team, led by Oklahoma State University chemistry professor Allen
Apblett, has come up with what it says is a nanomaterial that can both
detect and neutralize some dangerous explosives. If deployed in a
practical manner at airports in the U.S. and elsewhere around the world,
it could, in theory, make it possible once again for some people to
bring more liquids with them when they fly.
The material is essentially an ink composed of metallic oxide
nanoparticles tiny enough that tens of thousands of them would barely
fill out the diameter of a single human hair. In an interview yesterday,
Apblett said that in one form it's a dark blue reagent that changes
color when it encounters certain kinds of explosives. It can work
directly, in liquids, or it can in some circumstances work in the
presence of the vapors that can be let off by explosives.
And while the most prominent use of such a new technology could well be
at airports, the team of scientists is also aiming to give bomb squads,
hazmat crews, soldiers, and even firefighters better tools for finding
and eliminating potentially destructive explosives.
Still, there's little doubt that to the flying public the potential for
bringing along more liquids in their carry-on luggage again would be the
most interesting development.
Some would argue, of course, that the limit on liquids hasn't improved
safety at all and has done little more than inconvenience travelers. The
development of the nanomaterial presents a major market opportunity for
Apblett and his partners in XploSafe, the company they've formed around the discovery.
Related links
Bomb-detecting bees work for food
Divining rod reborn as explosive-detection device
Funded first by the Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism
and later by the National Science Foundation to develop materials for
the identification of improvised explosives, the team came up with
several detection and neutralization products, including sprays and
drops, as well as electronic monitoring systems.
Although testing liquids would be a major move forward, Apblett points
out that a TSA employee examining every bottle of water or soda or
infant formula that passengers might want to take with them when they
fly would likely be impractical.
Instead, Apblett imagines a system where travelers are told that they
can bring important liquids with them, knowing they'll have to stop for a
test.
Liquids that aren't meant for human consumption would be examined on a
test strip containing the nanomaterial that would change color if a
peroxide-based explosive was found, while samples of those meant for
drinking would be drawn into a tube, where a similar test would be
performed.
At the same time, Apblett said, XploSafe has developed an area sensor
that is designed to detect the vapors from peroxide high explosives. The
idea here is that travelers would pass through the sensors and, if
something suspicious is detected, they would be pulled aside for a
secondary search.
Of course, he said, there are many things that can cause false
positives, and indeed, Apblett said that he is frequently being checked
by airport security thanks to the presence of chemicals from various
labs that are found using current detection systems.
There are certainly other products and technologies being used or
developed to try to stop would-be terrorists from bringing explosives on
board airplanes. Already, the TSA has equipment that allows its workers
to swipe a piece of material on someone's belongings to see if there
are any traces of explosives. And an Israeli start-up called BioExplorers recently announced a system that leverages mice's strong sense of smell to potentially detect bombs or drugs.
Apblett said that explosives made with hydrogen peroxide are very likely
to give off some form of vapor, though a very careful terrorist might
avoid that slip-up. "The problem with trace explosives detection,"
Apblett said, "is that you're depending on them being sloppy."
Fortunately, he said, in many cases would-be bombers are not that
careful, and that in most cases, when someone fills a container with
some sort of material, traces are left on the outside. In the case of
hydrogen peroxide explosives, any such traces could set off the
detectors.
Given recent public outrage over new scanning systems at airports,
XploSafe is clearly looking to get its new detection systems on the
market as soon as possible. Already, it has some of its products for
sale. But it is now working hard to get the vapor sensors ready for
public use. Apblett imagines it could take six months to a year "until
we have those perfected."